Cox Regression

Cox Regression

Cox regression, also known as the Cox proportional hazards model, is a statistical technique used to explore the relationship between the survival time of subjects and one or more predictor variables. It is used in medical research, particularly for time-to-event data, where the goal is to investigate how certain factors influence the time until an event of interest occurs (e.g., death, disease recurrence).

Unlike other regression models, Cox regression does not assume any particular distribution for the survival times. Instead, it focuses on the hazard function, which represents the instantaneous rate at which the event occurs, given that the subject has survived up to a specific time. The model can handle continuous and categorical predictors and accommodate censored data (subjects for whom the event has not occurred by the end of the study period).

Critical components of Cox regression include:

– **Hazard Ratio (HR)**: This represents the effect of a predictor variable on the hazard, or risk, of the event occurring. A hazard ratio greater than 1 indicates an increased risk, while a hazard ratio less than 1 indicates a decreased risk.

– **Baseline Hazard Function**: This is the hazard function when all predictor variables are set to zero. It is unspecified in Cox regression, allowing for flexibility in the shape of the hazard function over time.

The main advantage of Cox regression is its ability to estimate the effect of predictors on survival time without needing to specify the underlying hazard function’s form.

Assumptions of Cox Regression

For Cox regression to yield valid and reliable results, several fundamental assumptions must be met:

1. **Proportional Hazards**: The model assumes that the hazard ratios are constant over time. This assumption means that the effect of a predictor variable on the hazard is proportional and does not change with time. Violations of this assumption can lead to biased estimates and incorrect conclusions.

2. **Independence of Survival Times**: The survival times of subjects should be independent of each other. This assumption ensures that the observations are not correlated, which could bias the results.

3. **Linearity of Continuous Predictors**: The relationship between continuous predictor variables and the log hazard is assumed to be linear. Non-linear relationships can be addressed through transformations or by including non-linear terms in the model.

4. **No-Omitted Predictor Variables**: All relevant predictor variables should be included in the model to avoid omitted variable bias. Excluding significant predictors can lead to inaccurate estimates and misleading results.

5. **No Tied Event Times**: The model assumes that event times are not tied (i.e., no two subjects experience the event simultaneously). When ties are present, methods such as Breslow, Efron, or exact partial likelihood can be used to handle them.

How to Interpret the Results of Cox Regression

Interpreting the results of Cox regression involves several steps:

1. **Hazard Ratios (HR)**: Examine the hazard ratios for each predictor variable. A hazard ratio greater than 1 indicates that the predictor increases the hazard (risk) of the event occurring, while a hazard ratio less than 1 indicates a protective effect. For example, an HR of 1.5 suggests a 50% increase in the hazard, whereas an HR of 0.7 suggests a 30% decrease.

2. **Statistical Significance**: Assess the p-values associated with the hazard ratios to determine the statistical significance of the predictors. A p-value less than 0.05 typically indicates that the predictor is significantly associated with the survival time.

3. **Confidence Intervals**: Examine the 95% confidence intervals for the hazard ratios. The predictor is statistically significant if the confidence interval does not include 1. Narrow confidence intervals indicate more precise estimates of the hazard ratios.

4. **Proportional Hazards Assumption**: Check the proportional hazards assumption by examining plots of scaled Schoenfeld residuals or using statistical tests like the Schoenfeld test. If the assumption is violated, consider stratifying the model or including time-varying covariates.

5. **Model Fit**: Evaluate the model’s overall fit using measures such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Lower values indicate a better-fitting model. The global goodness-of-fit test can also be assessed using the Likelihood Ratio Test.

For example, in a study investigating the effect of age, gender, and smoking status on the survival time of patients with lung cancer, you might find that:

– The hazard ratio for age is 1.02 (p < 0.01), indicating that each additional year increases the hazard of death by 2%.

– The hazard ratio for gender (male vs. female) is 1.5 (p = 0.05), suggesting that males have a 50% higher risk of death compared to females.

– The hazard ratio for smoking status (smoker vs. non-smoker) is 2.0 (p < 0.01), indicating that smokers have twice the risk of death compared to non-smokers.

By carefully interpreting these components, researchers can gain valuable insights into the factors influencing survival time and make informed decisions about interventions or treatments.


Are you looking for expert assistance to maximize the accuracy of your research? Our team of experienced statisticians can help. We offer comprehensive assessments of your data, methodology, and survey design to ensure optimal accuracy so you can trust us to help you make the most out of your research.


Expert Guidance: Our team brings years of experience in statistical analysis to help you navigate the complexities of your research.

Tailored to Your Needs: Whether you are fine-tuning your methodology or seeking clarity on your data, we offer personalized advice to improve your outcomes.

Build on a Foundation of Trust: Join the numerous clients who’ve transformed their projects with our insights—’ The evaluation was a game-changer for my research!’


Take advantage of this free offer. Enhance your research journey at no cost and take the first step towards achieving excellence by contacting us today to claim your free evaluation. With the support of our experts, let’s collaborate and empower your research journey.


Contact form located in the right corner of our website (on mobile: left corner); Responses within 1 hour during business hours

Phone: +1 (650) 460-7431


24/7 Chat Support: Immediate assistance via chat icon in the right corner of our website

Visit us: 530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Palo Alto, CA 94301

Your confidentiality is our priority. Non-disclosure agreements are available upon request.

Scroll to Top